On the Analysis of the DeGroot-Friedkin Model with Dynamic Relative Interaction Matrices
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper analyses the DeGroot-Friedkin model for evolution of the individuals’ social powers in a social network when the network topology varies dynamically (described by dynamic relative interaction matrices). The DeGroot-Friedkin model describes how individual social power (self-appraisal, self-weight) evolves as a network of individuals discuss opinions on a sequence of issues. We seek to study dynamically changing relative interactions because interactions may change depending on the issue being discussed. Specifically, we study relative interaction matrices which vary periodically with respect to the issues. This may reflect a group of individuals, e.g. a government cabinet, that meet regularly to discuss a set of issues sequentially. It is shown that individuals’ social powers admit a periodic solution. Initially, we study a social network which varies periodically between two relative interaction matrices, and then generalise to an arbitrary number of relative interaction matrices.
منابع مشابه
Opinion Dynamics and Social Power Evolution
Our recent work [28] proposes the DeGroot-Friedkin dynamical model for the analysis4of social influence networks. This dynamical model describes the evolution of self-appraisals in a5group of individuals forming opinions in a sequence of issues. Under a strong connectivity assumption,6the model predicts the existence and semi-global attractivity of equilibrium configurat...
متن کاملOpinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks
This paper studies the evolution of self appraisal, social power and interpersonal influencesfor a group of individuals who discuss and form opinions about a sequence of issues. Our empirical modelcombines the averaging rule by DeGroot to describe opinion formation processes and the reflected appraisalmechanism by Friedkin to describe the dynamics of individuals’ self appraisal and ...
متن کاملEvolution of Social Power in Social Networks with Dynamic Topology
The recently proposed DeGroot-Friedkin model describes the dynamical evolution of individual social power in a social network that holds opinion discussions on a sequence of different issues. This paper revisits that model, and uses nonlinear contraction analysis, among other tools, to establish several novel results. First, we show that for a social network with constant topology, each individ...
متن کاملStability Theory in $\ell_1$ for Nonlinear Markov Chains and Stochastic Models for Opinion Dynamics over Influence Networks
We study Markov chain models where the transition mechanism depends nonlinearly on the current state. One specific choice for such a model, where the state represents “belief,” was proposed in [1] to model opinion dynamics and is referred to as the DeGroot-Friedkin model. Herein, we consider a general class of such nonlinear Markov chain models and develop a theory for assessing stability. Our ...
متن کاملOpinion evolution in time-varying social influence networks with prejudiced agents
Investigation of social influence dynamics requires mathematical models that are “simple” enough to admit rigorous analysis, and yet sufficiently “rich” to capture salient features of social groups. Thus, the mechanism of iterative opinion pooling from (DeGroot, 1974), which can explain the generation of consensus, was elaborated in (Friedkin and Johnsen, 1999) to take into account individuals’...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1703.04901 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017